Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2020 № 2.

 

A.B. Nikushkin

EFFICIENCY OF DIGITAL TOOLS IN EXPANSION OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION (ICELAND AND ESTONIA EXPERIENCE). In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2020, no. 2.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2020-2-1005


UDC Index: 321.6/.8

Date of publication: 20.05.2020

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 31

Abstract


The purpose of the study is to identify factors that affect the degree of effectiveness of digital online platforms in expansion of political involvement. Methodology and Approach. The author analyzes the practical experience of using digital tools in Iceland and Estonia at the local, party and national levels, sociological data on the level of citizens participation and the main results of these platforms work. The research methods are based on a comparative case study using the formal-logical method, structure-function and SWOT-analysis. The results. The key efficiency and implementation problems of digital tools are identified. The paper concludes that the use of new technologies does not directly correlate with better quality of the political process, however it improves legitimacy of decision-making and broadens the electoral base of political parties. Theoretical Implications. The empirical material related to the research is summarized, the need for a differentiated approach to improving political participation with digital tools at different levels is formulated, as well as socio-cultural changes that should make this process more effective.

Key words


participation, citizen participation, digital democracy, direct democracy, participatory budgeting

List of references


1. Volkov L., Krasheninnikov F. Oblachnaya demokratiya [The Cloud Democracy]. Moscow, 2013. 240 p.
2. Volodenkov S. V. [Digital Technologies in the System of Traditional Institutions of Power: Political Potential and Contemporary Challenges]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyy zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2018, no. 2. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 24.11.2019). DOI: 10,18384 / 2224-0209-2018-2-893.
3. Perfileva O. V. [Getting over digital divide: The international organizations contribution]. In: Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii [International organizations research journal], 2007, no. 2 (10), pp. 34–49.
4. Toffler A. The Third Wave (Russ. ed.: Tret’ya volna. Moscow, 2010. 800 p.).
5. Eidman I. V. Proryv v budushchee. Sotsyologiya Internet-revolutsyi [Breakthrough into the future: Sociology of the internet revolution]. Moscow, 2007. 384 p.
6. Behrens J., Kistner A. The Principles of LiquidFeedback. Berlin, 2014. 240 p.
7. Baiocchi G., Ganuza E. Popular Democracy The Paradox of Participation. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2016. 224 p.
8. Hindman M. S. The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 2009. 208 p.
9. Increasing citizens participation: Lessons from Reykjavik and elsewhere. Available at: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qe_20SaYRsf-fcn1JWIKS65LuAOL8Ds2YsPrrg8AyEE/edit#slide=id.g4e919cc5b_027 (accessed: 28.09.2019).
10. Jonsson M. Democratic Innovations in Deliberative Systems – The Case of the Estonian Citizens’ Assembly Process. In: Journal of Public Deliberation, 2015, vol. 11, iss. 1, article 7.
11. Loader B. D., Mercea D. Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. In: Information, Communication & Society, 2011, no. 14 (6), pp. 757–769.
12. Lukensmeyer C. J. Civic Tech and Public Policy Decision Making. In: Journal of Political Science and Politics, 2017, no. 50 (3), pp. 764–771.
13. Norris P. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. 303 p.
14. O’Neil С. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York, 2016. 272 p.
15. Revell T. Pirate Party: We want our reputation to be more like Robin Hood. In: New Scientist, 07.11.2016. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/ article/2111618-pirate-party-we-want-our-reputation-to-be- more-like-robin-hood/ (accessed: 28.09.2019).
16. Simon J., Bass T., Boelman V. Digital Democracy: The tools transforming political engagement. London, 2017. 99 p.
17. Verba S., Nie N. H. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row, 1972. 428 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons