Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2020 № 3.

 

A.V. Manoilo

Cascade chain reactions in modern technologies of viral spread of “fake news”. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2020, no. 3.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2020-3-1027


UDC Index: 327

Date of publication: 15.09.2020

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 31

Abstract


Aim is to study “fake news”, “viral” technologies for their distribution, mechanisms of “infection” and modification, as well as methods of detection and counteraction. Methodology. The mechanisms of modification of viral fakes when broadcasting their “emotional code” through the media and messengers, known as “chain reactions”, and probing information impulses used for empirical research of network structures and communities, have been investigated. The mechanism of the viral spread of fakes is examined using the case-study method. Results. The sequential activation of the control “tabs” in the fake is described on the example of a two-phase model of the impact of viral information. It is noted that the most effective methods of countering fakes (including viral-type fakes) are the following ones: “preemptive strike” (used in case a fake attack is just being prepared), interception of the information agenda (used in case the attack has already begun) and implementation own information agenda (if the agenda has already been intercepted), which sets its own rules for the information “game”. Research implications. Information about the mechanism of the viral spread of “fake news” can be used in the context of post-truth research, and will also be useful to political scientists, political strategists and specialists in countering destructive political technologies.

Key words


politics, fake, fake news, post-truth, information, security, political process, political campaign, political communication

List of references


1. Abramov A. V., Fedorchenko S. N., Kurylev K. P. [The network nature of international terrorism and the possibilities of consolidating the Russian society]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations], 2017, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 738–748. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-4-738-748
2. Garbuznyak A. Yu. [Post-truth phenomenon: devaluation of fact in media discourse]. In: Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2019, no. 1, pp. 184–192. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2019.1.14
3. Kozharinova A. R. [Media viruses as carriers of ideological codes]. In: Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2013, no. 5. Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2013/5/Kozharinova_Media-Viruses (accessed: 07.05.2020).
4. Rushkoff D. Media Virus! Hidden Agendas in Popular Culture (Russ. ed.: Borisov D., transl. Mediavirus. Kak pop-kul’tura taino vozdeistvuet na vashe soznanie. Moscow, Ul’traKul’tura Publ., 2003. 368 p.).
5. Barrera Rodriguez O., Guriev S., Henry E., Zhuravskaya E. Facts, Alternative Facts, and Fact Checking in Times of Post-Truth Politics. In: Journal of Public Economics, Forthcoming, 2019, October. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3004631 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
6. Drexl J. Economic Efficiency versus Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper. No. 16–16. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2881191 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
7. Friedman H. The Dangers of Overconfidence and Absolute Certainty in the Age of Post-Truth, Junk Science, and Arrogance, 06.08.2017. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3014352 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
8. Hasen R. L. Deep Fakes, Bots, and Siloed Justices: American Election Law in a “Post-Truth” World. In: St. Louis University Law Journal, 2019, vol. 64, pp. 535–568.
9. Klein D., Wueller J. Fake News: A Legal Perspective. In: Journal of Internet Law, 2017, vol. 20, no. 10. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2958790 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
10. Marco Colino S. Brexit, Post-Truth Politics and the Triumph of a Messy Vision of Democracy over Technocracy. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2871027 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
11. Manoilo A. Skripal Readings as an Example of a Special Operation to Intercept the Information Agenda. The Latest Practice of Modern Information Warfare and Psychological Operations. In: Medium, 2020, no. 6. Available at: https://medium.com/@andreimanoilo/skripal-readings-as-an-example-of-a-special-operation-to-intercept-the-information-agenda-dd55b3dab908 (accessed: 22.07.2020).
12. Tsipursky G., Votta F. Fighting Fake News and Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science: The Pro-Truth Pledge. In: Behavior and Social Issues, 2018. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138238 (accessed: 22.07.2020).

Лицензия Creative Commons