Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2020 № 4.


S.B. Burceva

Analysis of the attack on Russia’s Soft power in the context of information operation. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2020, no. 4.


UDC Index: 327.88

Date of publication: 08.12.2020

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 30


Aim. The article presents an analysis of the attack on Russia’s “soft power” in the framework of the “Argentine Cocaine Case” information operation as a separate aspect of an information war in the context of a global conflict of centers of power. The role of the media both in the operation itself and in the process of creating and consolidating semantic labels is also studied.

Methodology. The research uses methods of empirical knowledge and systems analysis.

Results. The term “attack” is substantiated as applied to the negative impact on the “soft power” of Russia, the stages of the information operation are analyzed in detail, conclusions are formulated and recommendations to counteract such actions are given. Practical recommendations for coordinated actions of Russian state bodies to counter western information attacks and for creation of government structures to perform this function are presented.

Research implications. The article is of practical value, it contains unique material, since in a given context the informational impact on the “soft power” of Russia has not been previously studied and presented in the literature.

Key words

soft power of Russia, mass media, information attack, international influence, foreign policy, prestige of the state

List of references

1. Kosachev K. I. [“Soft power” with hard consequences]. In: Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii [Russian Journal of Legal Research], 2016, no. 1 (6), pp. 15–20.
2. Kosachev K. I. [Not a fish, but a fishing rod. What is the peculiarity of Russia’s “soft power”]. In: Rossiya v global’noi politike [Russia in global affairs], 2012, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 40–53.
3. Manoilo A. V. Informatsionnye voiny i psikhologicheskie operatsii. Rukovodstvo k deistviyu [Information warfare and psychological operations. A guide to action]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya-Telekom Publ., 2018. 496 p.
4. Manoilo A. V., Strigunov K. S. Tekhnologii neklassicheskoi voiny. Genezis. Evolyutsiya. Praktika [Non-classical war technologies. Genesis. Evolution. Practice]. Moscow, Hotline-Telekom Publ., 2020. 378 p.
5. Manoilo A. V. [Russian approach to the formation of the collective information security space of the BRICS countries]. In: Politologiya. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya [Political science. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 2018, vol. 4, no. 3 (15), pp. 156–163.
6. Matveenko Yu. I., Galaeva M. G. [“Soft power” as a factor in modern geopolitics]. In: PolitBook, 2015, no. 1, pp. 165–179.
7. Nye J. [“Soft power” and US-European relations]. In: Svobodnaya mysl’ – XXI [Free Thought – XXI], 2004, no. 10, pp. 33–41.
8. Gareev M. A., Remarchuk V. N., Alekseeva T. A., et al. Rol’ tekhnologii «myagkoi sily» v informatsionnom, tsennostno-mirovozzrencheskom i tsivilizovannom protivoborstve [The role of soft power technologies in information, value-world outlook and civilized confrontation]. Moscow, 2016. 306 p.
9. Filimonov G. Yu., Karpovich O. G., Manoilo A. V. Tekhnologii «myagkoi» sily na vooruzhenii SShA: otvet Rossii [«Soft» power technologies in the U.S. arsenal: Russia’s response]. Moscow, RUDN University Publ., 2015. 582 p.
10. Chikharev I. A., Stoletov O. V. [On the question of the relationship between the strategies of “soft power” and “reasonable power” in world politics]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12: Political Sciences], 2013, no. 5, pp. 26–43.
11. Noutcheva G. Whose legitimacy? The EU and Russia in contest for the eastern neighbourhood In: Democratization, 2017. Available at: (accessed: 21.07.2020).
12. Simons G. Policy and Political Marketing: Promoting Conflict as Policy/ In: Journal of Political Marketing, 2020. Available at: (accessed: 21.07.2020). DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2020.1724426.

Лицензия Creative Commons