Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2021 № 2.

 

D.A. Ezhov

DYNAMICS OF THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTIONS REPRESENTATION IN THE RUSSIAN MASS CONSCIOUSNESS. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 2.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2021-2-1064


UDC Index: 324

Date of publication: 20.04.2021

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 13

Abstract


Aim. To develop the measures aimed at popularizing the election procedure in the Russian mass consciousness and substantial correction of this institution perception model in the national political and legal culture.

Methodology. The research is based on institutional and psychological approaches; methods of observation, situation analysis and elements of discourse analysis are used.

Results. Reconstruction of the image characteristics of the elections institution and analysis of current trends in the elections organization in the perception of voters allowed to identify the dynamics of the elections representation in the Russian consciousness in the period from 2007 to the present. Some measures to increase electorate’s interest in the election procedure were proposed on the basis of the study conclusions.

Research implications. The study presents an analysis, with elements of scientific novelty, of current trends in the electoral process organization, including the innovations of 2020 (voting in adjacent (outdoor) areas, multi-day voting, etc.), from the perspective of their perception by the electorate.

Key words


elections, electorate, electoral process, mass consciousness, trust in elections, legitimacy of elections, election image, CEC of Russia

List of references


1. Alekseev R. A., Abramov A. V. [The electoral absenteeism in Russia and ways to overcome it (based on the 2000–2012 presidential elections)]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2016, no. 4. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 20.12.2020).
2. Berezkina E. Yu. [Special aspects and problems of image formation of public authority in social networks]. In: Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’ [Citizen. Elections. Authority], 2020, no. 3 (17), pp. 159–170.
3. Borisov I. B. [Public control as an integral part of legitimate elections]. In: Izbiratel’noe zakonodatel’stvo i praktika [Electoral Law and Practice], 2016, no. 1, pp. 41–45.
4. Bykov I. A. [Effects of low turnout in elections to the State duma of the Federal council of Russian Federation 2016]. In: Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political Expertize: POLITEX], 2017, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–87.
5. Gasanov I. B. [About trust in general and to elections in particular]. In: Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’ [Citizen. Elections. Authority], 2017, no. 4, pp. 5–38.
6. Golosov G. V. [Fairness of elections and voter turnout under authoritarianism]. In: Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 2019, no. 1, pp. 67–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.01.04.
7. Gorchakova O. G. [The turnout trends analysis from 1979 to 2009 on the example of the elections to the European parliament]. In: Sotzium i vlast’ [Society and Power], 2010, no. 4 (28), pp. 48–53.
8. Guseletov B. P. [European elections 2019: statistics and forecasts]. In: Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN [Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS], 2019, no. 3 (9), pp. 11–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320191116.
9. Ezhov D. A. [Actual trends and factors of the electoral activity of Russian youth]. In: Azimut nauchnyh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie [ASR: Economics and Management], 2018, vol. 7, no. 3 (24), pp. 356–358.
10. Ezhov D. A. [Show-oriented elections: the technologies and social consequences]. In: Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 2018, vol. 9, no. 2 (25), pp. 130–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.515.
11. Ezhov D. A. [Strategy of silence: summing-up (to the analysis of the results of the municipal elections in Moscow)]. In: Vlast’ [Authority], 2017, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 167–169.
12. Karaev R. Sh., Akopyan L. R. [Electoral inactivity determinants in contemporary Russia]. In: Konstitutzionnoe I munitzipal’noe pravo [Constitutional and Municipal Law], 2017, no. 4, pp. 46–48.
13. Karpov Yu. G. [Meme 146%: “the hand of Moscow” or the trivial incompetence of programmers?]. In: Yakubson V. M., Korablev V. V., Ustinov S. M., eds., et al. Nedelya nauki SPBPU [Week of Science at Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University]. Saint Petersburg, 2014, pp. 248–254.
14. Kiselev V. O. [Trust in Russian political institutions: sociological monitoring case study]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal], 2014, no. 6 (124), pp. 51–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2014.6.05.
15. Novosel’sskii S. O., Boserdt N. Yu., Khalina V. A. [Assessment political activities of the Russian voters]. In: Politika, ekonomika i innovatzii [Politics, Economy and Innovations], 2017, no. 1 (11). Available at: https://pei-journal.ru/index.php/PEII/issue/view/11/showToc (accessed: 20.12.2020).
16. Podlazov A. V. [A study of statistical methods for identifying fictitious election results: Part 1. Round numbers]. In: Preprinty IPM im. M. V. Keldysha [Keldysh Institute Preprints], 2019, no. 147, 28 p. DOI: http://doi.org/10.20948/prepr-2019-147. Available at: http://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2019-147 (accessed: 20.12.2020).
17. Podlazov A. V. [A study of statistical methods for identifying fictitious election results: Part 2. Clots of turnout and results]. In: Preprinty IPM im. M. V. Keldysha [Keldysh Institute Preprints], 2020, no. 20, 24 p. DOI: http://doi.org/10.20948/prepr-2020-20. Available at: http://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2020-20 (accessed: 20.12.2020).
18. Pyrma R. V. [Social networks and electoral participation: voting activation opportunities]. In: Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’ [Citizen. Elections. Authority], 2020, no. 3 (17), pp. 9–32.
19. Savchenko M. S., Kuemzhieva S. A., Goncharov V. V. [The system of electoral commissions in the Russian Federation as a public control object: a constitutional law analysis]. In: Izbiratel’noe zakonodatel’stvo i praktika [Electoral Law and Practice], 2020, no. 2, pp. 38–44.
20. Seleznev P. S., Mokin A. B., Sobolev A. V. [Political technologies aimed at increasing the voter turnout as an important part of electoral campaign]. In: Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’ [Citizen. Elections. Authority], 2018, no. 1, pp. 109–125.
21. Simonishvili L. R. [Problem of absenteeism in electoral law of today’s Russia]. In: Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State Authority and Local Self-government], 2016, no. 2, pp. 3–5.
22. Fedorov V. I, Ezhov D. A. [The use of mathematical methods for the evaluation of legitimacy of elections: heuristic opportunities and limitations]. In: Izbiratel’noe zakonodatel’stvo i praktika [Electoral Law and Practice], 2020, no. 4, pp. 31–37.
23. Shatilov A. B. [Electoral political activity in the Russian regions in the period 2013–2017: stability and / or innovative development]. In: Gumanitarnie nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University], 2017, vol. 7, no. 6 (30), pp. 81–87.
24. Rodionova M. E., Belokonev S. Yu., Seleznev P. S., Ezhov D. A., eds. Elektoral’nye proceccy v sovremennom mire [Electoral processes in the modern world]. Moscow, KNORUS, 2020, 492 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons