Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2021 № 2.


V.O. Krotkov

CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POLITICAL PROTEST: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND RUSSIAN PRACTICE. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 2, pp. 80-93.


UDC Index: 32.019.5

Date of publication: 08.06.2021 Page: 80 - 93

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 25


Aim. Identification of the determinants that define political protest, as well as consideration of Russian political practice related to political manifestation based on the proposed methodology.

Methodology. The article analyzes various methodological approaches that conceptualize political protest. In particular, the attributive qualities of the theories of relative deprivation, communicative behavior and resource mobilization, as well as the communicative concept are revealed. In addition, the analysis focuses on modern political actionism, which is inextricably linked with the virtualization and networking of public practices. Accordingly, the aspects that reveal the postmodern specifics of political protest are touched upon.

Results. The main methodological approaches that interpret the phenomenon of political protest in connection with regime consolidation are defined. In the example of the Russian case, characterized by protest manifestation, its features are analyzed on the basis of the relevant methodology. The basic conclusion is that the present-day domestic protest practices are determined and developed according to imperatives and in line with a set of scientific approaches.

Research implications. The results are mostly practical in nature, as they explain the motives and logic of the contemporary political protest development in Russia. The political elite can reconsider the political situation and take a set of measures aimed not so much at damping the protest, but at creating socio-economic conditions for the development of social strata (especially young people) and channeling political energy into a conventional channel.

Key words

political protest, scientific methods, postmodern, political regime, actionism

List of references

1. Akhremenko A. S., Petrov A. P., Shcheglov S. A. [How information and communication technologies change trends in the modeling of political processes: an agent approach].  In: Politicheskaya nauka [Political science], 2021, no. 1, pp. 12–45.
2. Brodovskaya E. V., Huang T. [Digital generation: civil mobilization and political protest of Russian youth]. In: Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes], 2019, no. 5, pp. 3–18.
3. Egorov V. G., Abramov A.V. [The axiological context of Russia’s political modernization]. In: Vestnik rossijskoj natsii [Bulletin of the Russian Nation], 2014, no. 5, pp. 118–133.
4. Klenova M. A. [Political values and basic attitudes in the structure of political culture of youth (the case of the Saratov region)]. In: Полилог/Polylogos, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4(14). Available at: (accessed: 06.03.2021).
5. Kostiushev V. V. [Social protest in the field of politics: potential, repertoire, discourse (theoretical interpretation and empirical verification)]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies], 2011, no. 4, pp. 144–157.
6. Matyukhin A. V. [Left views on liberal protests in Russia: Review of the Osin’s monograph “Left forces and spontaneous protest: history, lessons, modernity, prospects”]. In: Zhurnal politicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Political Research], 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 85–91.
7. Pustoshinskaya O. S. [Political protest as a concept: the problem of definition]. In: Almanah sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya [Almanac of Modern Science and Education], 2010. no. 1-2, pp. 83–87.
8. Rudenkin D. V. [Political protest in the focus of social and humanitarian science: basic conceptual approaches]. In: Byulleten nauki i praktiki [Bulletin of Science and Practice], 2019, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 345–354.
9. Stukal D. K., Belenkov V. E., Filippov I. B. [Data science methods in political science research: analyzing protest activity in social media]. In: Politicheskaya nauka [Political science], 2021, no. 1, рр. 46–75.
10. Henkin S. M. [Spain: modern trends of mass protest]. In: Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 2020, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 73–82.
11. Yavlinsky G. A. [On the political systems of the new age / Political Entropy (digital technologies and the globalization of disorder)]. In: GRIGORII YaVLINSKII: Politik, ekonomist [GRIGORY YAVLINSKY: Politician, economist]. Available at: https: // www. yavlinsky. ru / article/o-politicheskih-sistem-novoj-epokhi/ (accessed: 13.03.2021).
12. Habermas J. The theory of Communicative Action: in 2 vol. Vol. 2 : Lifeworld and System: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, Beacon Press, 1985. 457 p.
13. Kluge J. Putin und die Proteste in Russland: Die Zeit des Taktierens ist vorbei. In: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). Available at: (accessed: 15.03.2021).

Лицензия Creative Commons