Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Psychology" / 2021 № 2.

 

J.K. Barkova, E.V. Seleneva, Y.V. Sinyagin

TOP MANAGERS CONCEPT OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGEMENT TEAM EFFICIENCY FACTORS AND THEIR VALUE ORIENTATIONS. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 2, pp. 166-187.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2021-2-1074


UDC Index: 159.9.072.432

Date of publication: 18.06.2021 Page: 166 - 187

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 4

Abstract


Aim. The purpose of the study is to identify the peculiarities of the top management views on relationship between the factors of the management team effectiveness and their value orientations.

Methodology. The values questionnaire by Sh. Schwartz, the methodology “Career anchors” by E. Shein, a specially developed questionnaire “Selection and formation of an effective management team by the chief executive” were used as diagnostic tools as well as analysis of mean values, Mann-Whitney test, factor analysis with varimax-rotation.

Results. Analysis of the heads of the organization concept of the principles that should be relied on when selecting members of the management team showed that the majority of research participants in the selection rely on the principles of the resource approach, and also believe that the effectiveness of the management team is more determined by the professional competence of its members, than by their personal qualities. It was also shown that, in the opinion of research participants, professionalism is a constant criterion for selecting management team members, while similarity of beliefs and loyalty are variables. It has been established that, depending on the peculiarities of managers’ ideas about the principles and factors of forming an effective management team, as well as the factors of the effectiveness of its activities, there are significant differences both at the level of expressiveness of individual value orientations and at the level of their latent structure, i.e. at the level of value strategies. It is shown that both pro-social and pro-personal value strategies influence the opinion of managers about the factors of the effectiveness of the management team.

Research implications. The significance of the results obtained is determined by the importance of the command principle in increasing the efficiency of management in all spheres of social life and the role of the leader in the processes of formation, development and activities of the management team. The research materials make it possible to understand more deeply how the value orientations of managers affect their views on the factors of the effectiveness of the management team, and can be used in the framework of personal and professional consulting of organization leaders on the problems of team building and improving the efficiency of team management.

Key words


head of the organization, management team, efficiency, concept, value orientations, value strategies

List of references


1. Bessonov A. A. [Diagnostics of “team cooperation” when forming a management team]. In: Nauchnoe obespechenie sistemy povysheniya kvalifikatsii kadrov [Scientific support of a system of advanced training], 2014, no. 3 (20), pp. 48–55.
2. Boiko (Malashonok) A. A. [Diagnostics of interpersonal relations in the management team of a business organization]. In: Aktual’nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk [Topical issues of economic sciences], 2009, no 4-2, pp. 26–31.
3. Vainer A. V. [Group risk readiness as a socio-psychological factor in the effectiveness of management teams]. In: Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 2008, no. 4, pp. 45–55.
4. Gorshkova L. A., Poplavskaya V. A. [Analytical Tools for the Diagnostics and the Formation of a Management Team as an Element of the Organization Development Technique]. In: Uchet. Analiz. Audit [Accounting. Analysis. Auditing], 2016, no. 6, pp. 83–92.
5. Gulej I. A., Celyutina T. V. [Team coaching as a tool to increase motivation and efficiency of decision-making]. In: Vestnik Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta im. V. G. Shukhova [Bulletin of the Belgorod State Technological University named after V. G. Shukhov], 2015, no. 5, pp. 241–243.
6. Dolgov M. V. [Features of management teams in public service bodies]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie [RUDN Journal of Public Administration], 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 365–373. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8313-2018-5-4-365-373.
7. Kalinin I. V. Upravlencheskaya komanda: podbor blizhajshego okruzheniya rukovoditelem [Management team: selection of the closest circle of the leader]. Ul’yanovsk, UIPKPRO Publ., 2012. 212 p.
8. Mazurenko N. A., Odarenko T. E. [Anti-crisis human resource management in modern organizations]. In: Tavricheskii nauchnyi obozrevatel’ [Tavrichesky scientific observer], 2015, no. 3. Available at: http://tavr.science/stat/2015/11/TNO-3-ch-1-n.pdf (accessed: 29.12.2020).
9. Murugova E. G. Podgotovka upravlencheskix kadrov obrazovaniya v sisteme povy`sheniya kvalifikacii k komandnomu menedzhmentu: avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Training of management personnel in education in the system of advanced training for team management: abstract of PhD thesis in Pedagogic sciences]. Tomsk, 2013. 25 p.
10. Nikitin A. S., Gimazova Yu. V. [Value factor in the development of regional management teams]. In: Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 2018, vol. 20, no. 2 (112), pp. 8–16.
11. Pasholok N. A. Ocenka razvitiya upravlencheskix komand: avtoref. dis. … kand. ekon. nauk [Assessment of the development of management teams: abstract of PhD thesis in Economic sciences]. Moscow, 2013. 32 p.
12. Pochebut L. G., Chiker V. A. Organizatsionnaya sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Organizational Social Psychology]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2002. 298 p.
13. Selezneva E. V., Barkova Yu. K. [Social orientation of personality and value strategies of leaders of the civil service]. In: Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues], 2019, no. 4 (40), pp. 203–216. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-4-204-216.
14. Sinyagin Yu. V. Oprosnik otsenki upravlencheskogo potentsiala v kompleksnoi lichnostno-professional’noi diagnostike [Questionnaire for assessing managerial potential in complex personal and professional diagnostics]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2020. 186 p.
15. Sinyagin Yu. V. [Features representations of leaders about an effective management team and methods of its formation]. In: Zhivaya psikhologiya [Living psychology], 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–45.
16. Sinyagin Yu. V. Psikhologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya rukovoditelem upravlencheskoi komandy: dis. … dokt. psikhol. nauk [Psychological foundations of the formation of a managerial team by the leader: D. thesis in Psychological sciences]. Moscow, 1997. 464 p.
17. Sinyagin Yu. V. [Value orientations of modern leaders]. In: Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 2017, vol. 19, no. 1 (105), pp. 74–80.
18. Tlemeshok V. R. Upravlencheskaya komanda kak sub”ekt upravleniya budushchim: Sotsiologicheskii analiz: avtoref. dis. … kand. sotsiol. nauk [Management team as a subject of managing the future: Sociological analysis: abstract of PhD thesis in Sociological sciences]. Moscow, 2003. 23 p.
19. Tzyrenov D. D. [Expert and methodological support of management teams of the regional education system]. In: Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i menedzhment [Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Economics and Management], 2020, no. 2, pp. 41–46. DOI 10.18101/2304-4446-2020-2-41-46.
20. Chirkovskaya E. G., Klimenko M. A. [Organizational diagnostics in akmeological consulting orientation in organizational team behavior]. In: Akmeologiya [Acmeology], 2016, no. 1 (57), pp. 40–45.
21. Shvartz Sh., Butenko T. P., Sedova D. S., Lipatova A. S. [A refined theory of basic personal values: validation in Russia]. In: Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2012, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 43–70.
22. Bang H., Nesset Midelfart T. What characterizes effective management teams? A research-based approach. In: Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2017, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 334–359.
23. Mehek A. Team management: effective tool. In: International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 2020, vol. 02, no. 06, pp. 1376–1379.
24. Nezamaykin I. V., Serebryakova G. V., Sycheva S. M., Shramchenko T. B. Problems of team formation and functioning in modern conditions. In: The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2018, no. 57, pp. 893–904.
25. Pavlov D., Yahontova I. Formation of Effective Leading Project Teams: A Multi-Objective Approach. In: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2020, vol. 441. Available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icseal-6-19/125941003 (accessed: 27.02.2021).
26. Phoewhawm R., Moussa M. A Proposed Model for Enhancing the Performance and Learning Managerial Team. In: SIU Journal of Management, 2014, vol. 4, no. 2. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303590161_A_Proposed_Model_for_Enhancing_the_Performance_and_Learning_in_a_Managerial_Team (accessed: 28.02.2021).

Лицензия Creative Commons