Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Psychology" / 2021 № 2.

 

T.P. Skripkina

TRANSITIVE-TURBULENT SOCIETY: PROBLEMS OF PERSONALITY AND EDUCATION. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 2, pp. 188-208.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2021-2-1076


UDC Index: 159.9.01

Date of publication: 23.06.2021 Page: 188 - 208

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 12

Abstract


Aim. Using the interaction of teachers and students as an example, the study shows how the interaction of people has changed in the context of the socio-cultural situation of contemporary Russian society and its influence on some psychological and socio-psychological characteristics of people.

Methodology. The first theoretical part of the article contains an analysis of the current socio-cultural situation in Russian society. The second part illustrates the changes currently taking place in the educational space of the school. The study used methods that reflect the characteristics of teachers’ communicative competence and the trust factor. A brief description of the results of studying the features of communicative competence based on trust in professional activity (or lack thereof) among modern teachers is given.

Results. The results made it possible to identify six models of teachers’ communicative competence, illustrating the named changes in the relationship between teachers and students. The study showed that empathy and cooperation were gone from the relationship of teachers with students, and adaptation, that is, adaptation to difficult conditions, became the leading strategy of behavior. Teachers were conditionally divided into two groups, one of which is prone to the manifestation of communicative tolerance, and the other, on the contrary, to a complete lack of tolerance in interaction with students. The article compares data obtained through the same study conducted in 2005. The comparison shows changes in the interaction of teachers and students that have occurred over the past 15 years. In 2005, the main trend in the interaction of teachers with students was trust, empathy and cooperation.

Research implications. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the identification of the main characteristics of a transitive-turbulent situation: uncertainty of the future, complexity and diversity, multitasking, multiplicity of worlds and crisis and multiplicity of identities. It is shown that the rapidly occurring changes have generated significant social transformations in society. First of all, this concerns the emergence of a new cultural ethics and the formation of a different structure of value orientations among people and, especially, young people. The article also identifies other new psychological and socio-psychological phenomena generated by the modern socio-cultural situation. The practical significance of the article lies in the fact that it clearly shows the change in cultural ethics in the process of interaction of subjects of educational activity in the educational space.

 

Key words


transitive-turbulent society, post-industrial society, cultural ethics, trust, teacher’s communicative competence

List of references


1. Asmolov A. G. [Contemporary psychology: challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity]. In: Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 15.03.2021).
2. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. [Pre-adaptation to uncertainty as a strategy of developing navigation systems: routes of evolution]. In: Voprosy psikhologii, 2017, no. 4, pp. 3–26.
3. Akhiezer V. S. [Philosophical foundations of socio-cultural theory and methodology]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy questions], 2000, no. 9, pp. 29–45.
4. Babosov E. M. Osnovy ideologii sovremennogo gosudarstva [Fundamentals of the ideology of the modern state]. Minsk, 2004. 352 p.
5. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Russ. ed.: Sidel’nik V., Fedorova N., transls. Obshchestvo riska: Na puti k drugomu modernu. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000. 384 p.).
6. Gershenkron A. Ekonomicheskaya otstalost’ v istoricheskoi perspektive [Economic backwardness in historical perspective]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2015. 536 p.
7. Giddens E. [Consequences of modernity]. In: Inozemtsev V. L., ed. Novaya postindustrial’naya volna na Zapade [New post-industrial wave in the West]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 1999, pp. 101–122.
8. Gusel’tseva M. S., Konchalovskaya M. M., Khuzeeva G. R. [Multifactoriality as a principle of studying the development of adolescent identity in the modern world]. In: Mir psikhologii [The world of psychology], 2016, no. 1, pp. 224–237.
9. Zubarevich N. V. Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya [Regions of Russia: inequality, crisis, modernization]. Moscow, Independent Institute for Social Policy Publ., 2010. 159 p.
10. Luman N. Ponyatie riska [The concept of risk]. Available at: https://igiti.hse.ru/data/423/313/1234/5_2_2Luhm.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2021).
11. Martsinkovskaya T. D. [Modern psychology – challenges of transitivity]. In: Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2015, vol. 8, no. 42. Available at: http://psystudy.ru (accessed: 15.03.2021).
12. [J. Rotter’s methodology “Interpersonal Trust Scale” ITS (the methodology is translated and adapted by S. A. Dostovalov)]. In: Skripkina T. P., ed. Doverie v sotsial’no-psikhologicheskom vzaimodeistvii [Trust in social and psychological interaction]. Rostov-on-Don, 2006, pp. 323–324.
13. [Methodology “Self-confidence” by T. P. Skripkina]. In: Skripkina T. P., ed. Doverie v sotsial’no-psikhologicheskom vzaimodeistvii [Trust in social and psychological interaction]. Rostov-on-Don, 2006, pp. 318–322.
14. [Methodology “Tolerance in communication”]. In: Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V. V., Manuilov G. M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups]. Moscow, 2005, pp. 149–153.
15. [Methodology “Diagnostics of the level of empathy” (I. M. Yusupov)]. In: Ilyin E. P. Psikhologiya obshcheniya i mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relations]. St. Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2012, pp. 453–455.
16. [Methodology “Self-control in communication” (M. Snyder)]. In: Ilyin E. P. Psikhologiya obshcheniya i mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relations]. St. Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2012, pp. 504–505.
17. [Methodology “Assessment of methods of reaction in a conflict” (K. N. Thomas)]. In: Ilyin E. P. Psikhologiya obshcheniya i mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relations]. St. Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2012, pp. 431–432.
18. Mur B. Sotsial’nye istoki diktatury i demokratii. Rol’ pomeshchika i krest’yanina v sozdanii sovremennogo mira [Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. The Role of the Landowner and the Peasant in the Creation of the Modern World]. Moscow, High School of Economics Publ., 2016. 488 p.
19. Nazarova E. A. [Turbulence of the norms of modern society: the concept of “normal anomie”]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Journal of Sociology], 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 361–367.
20. Obrazovanie: sokrytoe sokrovishche (Learning: The Treasure Within): Osnovnye polozheniya Doklada Mezhdunarodnoi komissii po obrazovaniyu dlya XXI veka [Education: the hidden treasure (Learning: The Treasure Within): The main provisions of the Report of the International Commission on Education for the XXI century]. Available at: https://ifap.ru/library/book201.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2021).
21. Orlova E. A. [Socio-cultural preconditions of modernization in Russia]. In: Biblioteka v epokhu peremen. Vyp. 2 (10) [Library in an era of change. Iss. 2 (10)], Moscow, Pashkov dom Publ., 2001, pp. 2–14.
22. Parsons T. Sotsial’naya sistema [Social system]. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., 2018. 529 p.
23. Skripkina T. P., Tutova E. A. [Trust in the structure of the teacher]. In: Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Russian psychological journal], 2008, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–51.
24. Skripkina T. P. [Types of trusting relationships and teacher]. In: Le Chanceaux M., Sokolovskaya I. E. comps., eds. Chelovek v sovremennom mire: krizis i globalizatsiya [Man in the modern world: crisis and globalization]. Moscow, Entsiklopedist-Maksimum Publ., 2020, pp. 215–225.
25. Smakotina N. L. Osnovy sotsiologii nestabil’nosti i riska: filosofskii, sotsiologicheskii i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii aspekty [Foundations of the Sociology of Instability and Risk: Philosophical, Sociological and Socio-psychological Aspects]. Moscow, 2009. 241 p.
26. Fedotova M. G. [To the content of the concept of “transitive society”]. In: Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Vyatka State Humanities University], 2010, no. 1-4, pp. 28–31.
27. Feofanov K. A. Tsivilizatsionnaya teoriya modernizatsii [Civilization theory of modernization]. Moscow, Dashkov i K° Publ., 2019. 217 p.
28. Kharin Yu. A. [Modern Zvishenism: Realities and Perspectives of Man as a Socioanthropic Reality]. In: Kirvel C. S. ed. Cub”ektivnye prityazaniya i ob”ektivnaya logika v razvitii obshchestva perekhodnogo tipa [Subjective claims and objective logic in the development of a transitional type society]. Grodno, 1998, pp. 150–152.
29. Chernykh S. I., Borisenko I. G. [Changes in the ecosystem of education in a turbulent society]. In: Le Chanceaux M., Sokolovskaya I. E. comps., eds. Vysshee obrazovanie v sovremennom mire: istoriya i perspektivy: mezhdunarodnaya mezhdistsiplinarnaya kollektivnaya monografiya [Higher education in the modern world: history and prospects: International interdisciplinary collective monograph]. Moscow, Entsiklopedist-Maksimum Publ., 2020, pp. 83–95.
30. Shtompka P. [Social change as trauma]. In: Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2001, no. 1, pp. 6–16.
31. Shchekotin E. V. [Social Governance in a Turbulent Society: Safety and Risk Issues]. In: Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and power], 2016, no. 1 (57), pp. 87–92.
32. Eizenshtadtf Sh. [Disruptions to modernization]. In: Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul’ture [Emergency ration. Debates about politics and culture], 2010, no. 6 (74). Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2010/6 (accessed: 15.03.2021).
33. Yanitskiy O. N. Sotsiologiya riska [Sociology of risk]. Moscow, LVS Publ., 2003. 192 p.
34. Douglas M. Risk as forensic resource. In: Daedalus: The journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1990, no. 119 (4), pp. 1–16.
35. Skripkina T. P. The main provisions of the concept of confidential relations of the person. In: The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. Moscow, Future Academy, 2019, pp. 651–657.

Лицензия Creative Commons