Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Philological sciences" / 2021 № 3.


E.Y. Kislyakova, S.I. Madzhaeva

OTHERNESS AS A PARAMETER OF COMMUNICATIVE INTERACTION. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 3.


UDC Index: 316.77:811.161.1

Date of publication: 20.08.2021

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 10


Aim. The purpose of the study is to identify the linguistic means of expressing the implicit category of otherness as a communicative parameter.
Methodology. The main methods of research are: descriptive, taxonomic, contextual and discursive analyses.
Results. Linguistic means of alterity as a parameter of real and fictional communication and their ecolinguistic impact. are identified.
Research implications. The research results contribute to ecolinguistics, cognitive linguistics and theory of communication.

Key words

alterity, implicit category, communicative parameter, linguistic manifestation of alterity, textual manifestation of alterity, (non)ecological impact of alterity

List of references

1. Golovanova E. I., Madzhaeva S. I. [On the vocabulary of the coronavirus pandemic epoch]. In: Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin], 2020, no. 7, pp. 48–57. DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2020-10707
2. Kislyakova E. Yu. Kommunikativnaya kategoriya inakosti [The communicative category of otherness]. Volgograd, Nauchnoe izdatel’stvo VGSPU «Peremena» Publ., 2018. 250 p.
3. Kislyakova E. Yu. [The category of alterity via communicative strategies and tactics]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics], 2018, no. 1, pp. 8–17. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2018-1-8-17
4. Malakhov V. S. [Paradoxes of multiculturalism]. In: Inostrannaya literatura [Foreign literature], 1997, no. 11, pp. 171–174.
5. Mat’yash O. I. [Language in interpersonal communication]. In: Mezhlichnostnaya kommunikatsiya: teoriya i zhizn’ [Interpersonal communication: theory and life]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2011, pp. 211–273.
6. Nesterova Ya. A., Chernukha T. V. [Term and terminology. Political vocabulary]. In: Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Izvestiya Tula State University], 2008, no. 2, pp. 226–236.
7. Polovtsev D. O. Inakovost’ kak filosofsko-literaturnaya kategoriya [Otherness as a philosophical and literary category]. Available at: (accessed: 22.11.2020).
8. Sternin I. A. [Tolerance and communication]. In: Filosofskie i lingvokul’turologicheskie problemy tolerantnosti [Philosophical and linguoculturological problems of tolerance]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publ., 2003, pp. 331–344.
9. Takhtarova S. S. [Communicative categories in the cognitive-discursive paradigm]. In: Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2017, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 189–196. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.2.21.
10. Shakhovskii V. I. Dissonans ekologichnosti v kommunikativnom kruge: chelovek, yazyk, emotsii [Dissonance of environmental friendliness in the communicative circle: person, language, emotions]. Volgograd, Publishing house of IP Polikarpov I. L., 2016. 504 p.
11. Britton J. H. Sermon: Beneath the Cross of Jesus: Finding the Other. In:
12. Anglican Theological Review, 2004, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 567–571.

Лицензия Creative Commons