Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: info@evestnik-mgou.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2021 № 4.

 

M.Y. Martynov, A.I. Gaberkorn

PATRIOTIC DISCOURSE IN “NEW MEDIA” IDEOLOGICAL TRENDS IN MODERN RUSSIA. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 4.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2021-4-1097


UDC Index: 32.019.51

Date of publication: 31.10.2021

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 21

Abstract


Aim. The article examines the ideological filling of the concept of patriotism in the “new media” ideological trends.
Methodology. The texts of bloggers who can be considered public opinion leaders in the “two-stage” model of social networks communication were analyzed. The most influential bloggers were identified in the survey conducted among university teachers, journalists and public associations.
Results. The study has demonstrated a consistent conceptualization of patriotism discourses in “new media” by the ideological framework of traditional political ideologies. It is shown that the official discourse of the “patriotism” concept is widely represented in “new media”. In accordance with the meanings of conservative ideology, patriotism is presented as a feeling based on the non-political emotional attachment, “love for the Motherland”. This allows, using the idea of opposing the “common enemy”, to promote relative consolidation in the currently socially split society and contribute to the legitimation of power. At the same time, the “new media” of liberal and socialist orientation putting forward the charges of non-patriotic behavior in relation to power, use the concept of patriotism for its de-legitimation.
Research implications. The study showed that the main ideological confrontation and struggle of opinions takes place not so much between “new media” as a potential protest resource and official discourse, but inside the “new media”, along the lines of ideological faults.

Key words


Ideology, “New Media”, Social Networks, Patriotism, Public Opinion Leader

List of references


1. Abramov A. V. [Modern Russian patriotism as a marker of civic identity and society]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: History and Political Sciences], 2014, no. 3, pp. 215–221.
2. Akhremenko A. S., Stukal D. K., Petrov A. P. [Network vs message in protest diffusion on social media: theoretical and data analytics perspectives]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2020, no. 2, pp. 73–91.
3. Bespalova T. V., Kostyuchenko O. V. [Political chain in public administration system: major conceptual approaches]. In: Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law], 2012, no. 3, pp. 40–44.
4. Volkov D. Protestnoe dvizhenie v Rossii v kontse 2011–2012 gg.: istoki, dinamika, rezul’taty [Protest movement in Russia at the end of 2011–2012: origins, dynamics, results]. Available at: http://emsu.ru/extra/pdf5s/lobbyist/2012/6/44.pdf (accessed: 20.05.2021).
5. Zelenko B. I., Shimanskaya E. I. [On political sense in social networks (intentional context)]. In: Vlast’ [The Authority], 2018, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 74–78.
6. Kosov G. V., Potapov V. A., Shiryaev V. A. [Political Networks: Specific Characters of the Modern Architectonics]. In: Vlast’ [The Authority], 2013, no. 10, pp. 64–69.
7. Kunshchikov S. V. Stroganov V. B. [Transformation of the specifics of political manipulation in the “new media”]. In: Voprosy upravleniya [Management issues], 2018, no. 6, pp. 7–12.
8. Kurochkin A. V. [Political networks theory: formation preconditions and place in modern political science]. In: Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul`turologiya i iskusstvovedenie: voprosy` teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2011, no. 8-3, pp. 117–120.
9. Lazarsfeld P., Merton R. [Mass Communication, popular taste and organized social action]. In: Nazarov M., transl. Massovaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom mire: metodologiya analiza i praktika issledovaniya [Mass communication in the modern world: analysis methodology and research practice]. Moscow, AVANTI PLYUS Publ., 2004. 233 p.
10. Miroshnichenko I. V., Morozova E. V. [Investors of political capital: social nets in the political space of a region]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2009, no. 2, pp. 60–76.
11. Nosovets S. G. [New media: defining the notion]. In: Kommunikativnye issledovaniya [Communication Research], 2016, no. 4, pp. 39–47.
12. Radina N. K. [Digital political mobilization of online commenters on publications about politics and international relations]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2018, no. 2, pp. 115–129.
13. Smorgunov L. V. [The network approach to policy making and governance]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2001, no. 3, pp. 103–112.
14. Tikhonova S. V. [Social networks: problems of internet socialization].
15. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2016, no. 3, pp. 138–152.
16. Foucault M. [The discourse on language]. In: Tabachnikova S., transl. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual`nosti [Will to the truth: on the other side of knowledge, power and sexuality]. Мoscow, Kastal’ Publ., pp. 47–97.
17. Bisbee J., Larson J. M. Testing Social Science Network Theories with Online Network Data: An Evaluation of External Validity. In: American Political Science Review, 2017, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 502–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000120
18. Börzel T. Rediscovering Policy Networks as a Form of Modern Governance (Book Review). In: Journal of European Public Policy, 1998, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 354–359.
19. Pooley J., James W. Carey and Communication Research: Reputation at the University’s Margins. New York, Peter Lang Publishing Inc., 2016. 234 p. DOI: 10.33767/osf.io/npkb5
20. Rheingold H. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA,
21. Perseus Publishing, 2002. 288 р.
22. Rhodes R. A. W., Marsh D. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992. 312 p.
23. Theocharis Y. The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation. In: Social Media + Society, 2015, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115610140
24. Tufekci Z., Wilson C. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. In: Journal of Communication, 2012, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 363–379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
25. Van Dijk T. Discourse and manipulation. In: Discourse & Society, 2006, no. 17 (2), pp. 359–383. DOI: 10.1177/0957926506060250

Лицензия Creative Commons