Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2021 № 4.


A.E. Kon'kov

LATENT MECHANISMS IN PUBLIC SPACE OF STATE POLICY: APPROACHES AND INTERPRETATIONS. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 4.


UDC Index: 321

Date of publication: 24.11.2021

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 12


Aim. To develop approaches to identify and critically evaluate latent mechanisms in political practices of modern public actors.
Methodology. The main methods of research are: institutional, normative, comparative analysis, extrapolating and predictive method, system approach, overt observation.
Results. Actor, attributive and instrumental models for identifying and interpreting latent mechanisms of public policy are defined as well as a range of directions for integrating public and latent phenomena in relevant political discourse.
Research implications. The research results contribute to the theory of public decision-making and political communication.

Key words

linguistic expertise, speech behavior, subtext, implicit information, explicit information state policy, public policy, public sphere, latent sphere, latent mechanisms, latency

List of references

1. Alekseenkova E. S., Sergeev V. M. [The dark well of power (on the border between the private sphere of the state and the private sphere of the individual)]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2008, no. 3, pp. 148–165.
2. Antonova G. M. [Evolution of the terms “black box” and “gray box”]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovo-yuridicheskogo universiteta [Herald of the Moscow university of finances and law MFUA], 2012, no. 1, pp. 16–19.
3. Arendt H. Vita activa oder Vom tдtigen Leben (Rus. ed.: Bibikhin V. V., transl. Vita Activa, ili O deyatel’noi zhizni. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2000. 437 p.).
4. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard (Rus. ed.: Uralskaya O. Yu., transl. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. Moscow, International relationships Publ., 1998. 280 p.).
5. Bodrunova S. S. [Public Sphere Concepts and Mediacratic Theory: Searching for Common Ground]. In: Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2011, no. 1,
6. pp. 110–132.
7. Bourdieu P. Espace social: champs et pratiques (Rus. ed.: Shmatko N. A., comp., ed., transl. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2007. 567 p.).
8. Koz’yakova M. I. [Public space: culture of representation (beginning)]. In: Kul’tura kul’tury [Culture of Culture], 2017, no. 3. Available at: (accessed: 25.04.2021).
9. Krauze A. A. [Tradition and innovation in the study of the phenomena of the collective and the individual]. In: Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya № 3. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Bulletin of the Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University], 2018, no. 2, pp. 8–13.
10. Kuryukin A. N. [Public interest, public policy and systemic modernization of society: Russian problems]. In: Vlast’ [The Authority], 2011, no. 2,
11. pp. 166–173.
12. Linde A. N. [The value of the communicative approach of J. Habermas in the development of the modern theory of political communication]. In: Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, parvo [Society: politics, economics, law], 2016, no. 2, pp. 53–57.
13. Men’shikova G. A. [The culture of publicity as the attribute of democracy in modern states and societies]. In: Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury [Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture], 2015, vol. 208, pp. 246–257.
14. Mrochko L. V., Pirogov A. I. [Information needs and personal interests: universals and particulars collateral subordination]. In: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Economic and Social Research], 2016, no. 3 (11), pp. 125–129.
15. Primakov E. M. Minnoe pole politiki [Politics minefield]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 2019. 400 p.
16. Sogomonyan V. E. [The definition of the notion of “publicity of authorities”]. In: Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relations], 2010, no. 4, pp. 98–105.
17. Solov’ev A. I., Miller T. V. [The latent sphere of politics: a version of theoretical identification]. In: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik
18. [Public administration. Electronic bulletin], 2017, no 63. Available at: (accessed: 04.30.2021).
19. Patrushev S. V., Kuchinov A. M., Miryasova O. A., Nedyak I. L., Pavlova T. V., Filippova L. E. [Formation of Civic Responsibility in Russia: Institutional Context]. In: Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice], 2020, no. 1 (29), pp. 27–47.
20. Habermas J. Strukturwandel der Цffentlichkeit; Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bьrgerlichen Gesellschaft (Rus. ed.: Ivanova V. V., transl. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoi sfery. Issledovanie otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., 2016. 344 p.).
21. Chugrov S. V. [Formation and evolution of publicity (about the book by J. Habermas)]. In: Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2017, no. 12, pp. 168–172.
22. Shkudunova Yu. V. [Society, state, individual in public and private spheres]. In: Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University], 2011, no. 4, pp. 213–216.
23. Dragu T., Fan X. An agenda-setting theory of electoral competition. In: The Journal of Politics, 2016, no. 4, pp. 1170–1183.
24. Easton D. A. Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, Wiley, 1965. 507 p.
25. Gürbey G., Hofmann S., Seyder F. I. Between State and Non-State. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 278 p.
26. Habermas J. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1992. 704 p.
27. Harder R. A., Sevenans J., Van Aelst P. Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. In: The International Journal of Press/Politics, 2017, no. 3,
28. pp. 275–293.
29. Panayotou T. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. In: Environment and development economics, 1997, no. 4, pp. 465–484.
30. Schedler A., ed. The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics. London, Macmillan Press, 1997. 197 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons