Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Politics" / 2021 № 4.


 . Olga S.

DEVELOPING CONSTRUCTIVE INTERACTION WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC (THE EXAMPLE OF THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA). In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2021, no. 4, pp. 49-61.


UDC Index: УДК 621.039.009

Date of publication: 02.12.2021 Page: 49 - 61

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 8


Aim. Revealing the peculiarities of the dialogue between ROSATOM and its organizations with the public concerned to form social demand for the development of nuclear energy. Identifying effective forms of interaction and working out recommendations for the development of the dialogue.
Methodology. In the research, the experience of informational, educational and explanatory work carried out by ROSATOM and its organizations with the population and the public in the interests of developing the nuclear industry in order to meet the main challenges of our time was summarized. The analysis of regional features and institutional analysis of the Public Council of the State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” as a body influencing decision-making in one of the key industries in Russia were carried out.
Results. New directions of work are proposed to form a positive attitude of the population towards the development of Russian nuclear technologies. It is shown that increasing the level of environmental literacy and better informing the public about radiation are essential. It is recommended to maintain a dialogue with the interested public, taking into account the specifics of the region, as well as the positive impact of nuclear industry organizations on the socio-economic, socio-cultural aspects that determine the quality of life of the population. The characteristics of encouraging and facilitating a dialogue with the interested public as a voluntary initiative of the nuclear industry have been determined. The Public Council of ROSATOM role in as an effective mechanism for public participation in decision-making regarding the development of the industry was considered. The Council initiatives aimed at increasing the level of public confidence, ensuring interaction with civil society are described. Recommendations for the development of interaction are formulated.
Research implications. The article summarizes new material on the formation and development of the institution of public councils using the example of the Public Council of the State Corporation “Rosatom”. The author proposes directions for further study of the problem of public participation in decision-making by the authorities.

Key words

public, public council, nuclear energy, civil society

List of references

1. Kudryavtseva O. V., Derkach A. S., Manushko S. V., Nesvetov F. D., Pekarev S. V., Chetvertakov V. S. [Nuclear energy in the context of sustainable development]. In: Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta. Elektronnyi zhurnal [Scientific research of the Faculty of Economics. Electronic journal], 2018, no. 10 (4). Available at: (accessed: 13.01.2021).
2. Antonov D. E., Arutyunyan K. N., Golovikhina O. S., et al. Atomnaya energetika v prostranstve internet-kommunikatsii [Nuclear energy in the space of Internet communication]. Moscow, Akvilon Publ., 2018. 132 p.
3. Gorin N. V., Ekidin A. A., Nechaeva S. V., Golovikhina O. S. [Society and Atomic Industry Enterprises Information Interests: Experience of Conflicts]. In: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik [Public Administration. E-journal], 2020, no. 83. Available at:
4. (accessed: 13.01.2021). DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10108
5. Shutov A. Yu., Demchuk A. L., Kuznetsov I. I., eds. Dinamika vzaimootnoshenii gosudarstva, obshchestva i krupnogo biznesa v sovremennoi Rossii: praktiki dialoga i razresheniya konfliktov na primere regionov prisutstviya predpriyatii atomnoi otrasli [Dynamics of Relations between the State, Society and Big Business in Modern Russia: Practices of Dialogue and Conflict Resolution on the example of regions where nuclear industry enterprises are present] Moscow, KDU Publ., Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2020. 114 p.
6. Gorin N. V., Golovikhina O. S., Glazov E. E., Ekidin A. A., Nechaeva S. V. [Awareness-raising as a tool in developing atomic industry]. In: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik [Public Administration. E-journal], 2021, no. 85. Available at: (accessed: 13.01.2021).
7. Mel’nikova N. V., Artemov E. T., Bedel’ A. E., Voloshin N. P., Mikheev M. V. Istoriya vzaimodeistviya yadernoi energii i obshchestva v Rossii [The history of interaction between nuclear energy and society in Russia]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publishing House Publ., 2018. 127 p. DOI: 10.15826/B978-7996-2492-7
8. Kapitsa P. L. [Energy and physics: report at the scientific session dedicated to the 250th anniversary of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 8 October, 1975]. In: Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR [Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 1976, no. 1. Available at: (accessed: 13.01.2021).
9. McLuhan G. M. Understanding Media: External Extensions of Man (Rus. ed.: Nikolaev V., transl. Ponimanie media: vneshnee rasshirenie cheloveka. Moscow, Giperboreya Publ., 2007. 464 p.).
10. Pichugina O. A. [Transformation of mass communication reality during the era of social media]. In: Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Sotsial’no-kommunikativnye nauki [RGGU Bulletin. Series: Political science. Social and communicative sciences], 2013, no. 1 (102), pp. 268–276.
11. Ponomarev L. I. [Today’s civilization has no future without nuclear power]. In: Atomnyi ekspert [Atomic expert], 2018, no. 3-4, pp. 70–75.
12. Selezneva A. V., Evgen’eva T. V., Antonov D. E., et al. [Round table “Russian youth in the state and society: socio-cultural and political-psychological dimensions”]. In: Polilog [Polylogos], 2020, vol. 4, no. 4. Available at: (accessed: 12/31/2020). DOI: 10.18254 / S258770110013200-2
13. Rubleva M. E., Khotsinskaya K. I., Sharafutdinov R. A., Gavrikov V. L., Nagorskaya V. V. [Nuclear power in the discussions on carbon footprint: clean among principal, stable among clean]. In: Problemy regional’noi ekologii [Problems of Regional Ecology], 2018, no. 1, pp. 73–79.
14. Brook B. W., Alonso A., Meneley D. A., Misak J., Blees T., van Erp J. B. Why Nuclear Energy Is Sustainable and Has to Be Part of the Energy Mix. In: Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2014, no. 1-2, pp. 8–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2014.11.001

Лицензия Creative Commons