This paper deals with the problem of studying the family in the aspect of subjective perceptions that reflect the realities of man’s relationship to the family and inside the family. The authors justify and empirically illustrate the possibility of exploring a family perspective through the use of metaphors. In the main part of the work the author’s original research evaluation of metaphors of the family is presented. It reveals the meaning and content of positive and negative aspects of family positioning. The results of the study demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of using the metaphorical approach to the study of family problems and characteristics of individual consciousness in the field of family life. Besides, they justify the possibility of using the data obtained within the research in family counseling.

metaphors, cognitive models of the family, metaphoric approach, family problems, metaphoric images, feminine psychology

1. Almazova O.V., Dzukaeva V.P., Sadovnikova T.Yu. [The use of the semantic differential method in the study of boys and girls’ representations about the family]. In: Znanie. Ponimanie. Umeniye [Knowledge. Understanding. Skills], 2015, no. 2, pp. 277–290.
2. Berezina T.N., Tereshchenko R.N. [Emotional creativity of a person: definition and structure]. In: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika [Psychology and Psychotechnics], 2012, no. 2, pp. 43–50.
3. Zadvornova Yu.S. [Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of gender relations in the family in international sociology]. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki [Bulletin of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences], 2013, no. 2 (30), pp. 27–31.
4. Podshivailova L.S. [Mathematical modeling in the study of students]. In: Vestnik Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Altai State Pedagogical University], 2011, no. 6, pp. 43–46.
5. Rozenova M.I. [Opportunities of creating and implementing the national program of prevention and therapy aimed at psycho-social rehabilitation, preservation and development of the family]. In: Problemnoe pole sovremennoi sem’i: materialy I Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Moskva, 18–19 iyunya 2015 g. [The problem field of the modern family: Proceedings of I International scientific-practical conference, Moscow, June 18–19, 2015]. Moscow, MRSU Publishing House Publ., 2015. pp. 14–21.
6. Rozenova M.I. [Semantics of perceiving the basic relations of personality by modern youth]. In: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika [Psychology and Psychotechnics], 2013, no. 6, pp. 536–545.
7. Rozenova M.I. [Emotional default: problems of dissatisfaction and disintegration of important relationships]. In: Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika [Psychology and Psychotechnics], 2015, no. 10, pp. 1044–1053.
8. Solov’eva L.A. [Content analysis of the category “family” in socio-humanitarian studies]. In: Dostizheniya vuzovskoi nauki [Achievements of university science], 2014, no. 9, pp. 93–98.
9. Shavaleeva A.R., Aidarova V.I. [Socio-psychological notions of the family in modern studies on the problem of formation of culture of marital relations]. In: Novaya nauka: Teoreticheskii i prakticheskii vzglyad [New Science: Theoretical and Practical View], 2016, no. 8 (88), pp. 93–96.
10. Sharmandzhiev D.A. [The definition of the family in socio-philosophical research]. In: Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice], 2016, no. 12-3 (74), pp. 209–211.
11. Shneider L.B., Solomatina E.M. Praktikum po psikhologii sem’i i semeinomu konsul’tirovaniyu [Workshop on the psychology of the family and family counselling]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social University Publ., 2012. 496 p.
12. Hanson М., Lynch Е. Family Diversity: Implications for Policy and Practice. In: Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1992, vol. 12 (3), pp. 283–306.