Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Philological sciences" / 2017 № 4.


E.V. Gabrielova

IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT WAY OF EXPRESSING PERSONAL OPINION ON MIGRATION PROBLEM ON TWITTER. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2017, no. 4.


UDC Index: 81’27

Date of publication: 08.11.2017

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 39


This paper examines the linguistic tools adopted by Twitter English-speaking users to express their personal opinion on the immigration issues in the EU and the USA. The purpose of the current research is to define the link between the content of the message and the way it is expressed either implicitly or explicitly. The investigation is based on the content analysis of tweets collected for five months and processed by program Atlas.ti. The findings of this research illustrate how Twitter users communicate with each other and discuss political and social issues, and in what way they influence each other’s opinion using various linguistic tools while being restricted to only 140 characters.

Key words

implicit estimation, explicit estimation, new media, linguistic expressive tools, migration

List of references

1. Vol’f E.M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of evaluation]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2002. 280 p.
2. Dobrosklonskaya T.G. [Mediadiscource as a subject of linguistics and cross-cultural communication]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika [Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Series 10. Journalism], 2006, no. 2, pp. 20–33.
3. Zurker E. [How legal Trump’s migration policy is?]. In: Russkaya sluzhba BBC [Russian service BBC]. Available at: (accessed: 08.08.2017).
4. Kunin A.V. Kurs frazeologii sovremennogo angliiskogo yazika [The course of phraseology of contemporary English]. Dubna, Feniks+ Publ., 2005. 488 p.
5. Maksimenko O.I., Hromenkov P.N. [Verbal genesis of conflicts of Internet requests]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Russkiy i inostrannie yaziki i metodika ih prepodavaniya [RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Research and Teaching], 2016, no. 3, pp. 68–81.
6. [Migrants “are attacking”. Four problems for an old lady-Europe]. In: Obozrevatel’.ua []. Available at: (accessed: 08.08.2017).
7. [Russia, Europe and the world: migration problems]. In: Available at: (request date: 08.08.2017).
8. Hromenkov P.N. [Communication features of a conflict]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics], 2011, no. 6, vol. 2, pp. 67–69.
9. Benski T., Langman L., Perugorria I., Tejerina B. From the streets and squares to social movement studies: What have we learned? In: Current sociology, 2003, vol. 61, no. (4), pp. 541–561.
10. Biemann C. Structure Discovery in Natural Language. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Publ., 2012. 198 p.
11. Greenhow C., Gleason B. Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice. In: The Education Forum. Available at: (accessed: 05.03.2014).
12. Zimmer B. On the front line of Twitter linguistics in Computational linguistics. In: Language and technology. Language on the internets. Available at: (accessed: 28.01.2015).
13. Available at: (accessed: 25.07.2017).

Лицензия Creative Commons