Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in



or
Печатный вестник PRINTED
JOURNALS OF
MRSU
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the
MRSU
CONTACT US:

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

Telephone:
+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31

E-mail: evest_mgou@mail.ru,
e-mag@mgou.ru

Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.

 

WE IN SOCIAL MEDIA

BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Philological sciences" / 2019 № 1.

 

I.A. Shashkov

RELIGIOUS ONLINE DISCOURSE: SOCIOLINGUISTIC ASPECT. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2019, no. 1, pp. 138-148.

Doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2019-1-944


UDC Index: 81’242:004

Date of publication: 29.03.2019 Page: 138 - 148

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 11

Abstract


The article deals with researching the phenomenon of the religious internet-discourse through the lens of socially determined factors influencing speech communicative behaviour of the net user’s language identity. The author explains definition of the hypertext material as a basic unit providing successful functioning of the researched discourse type. The analysis of the definite strategies, tactics and ways used by the producent proves cognitive pragmatic power of the hypertext to influence the language identity of the religious internet-discourse participant. Practical significance of the article consists in using methods of network navigation and browsing from the position of the user’s language identity with the aim of studying particularities of realizing information distributive and sociocommunicative functions of the hypertext material. Basing on the research results the author comes to the conclusion that functioning of the studied discourse type is mediated with the hypertext space. The researcher manages to renovate the topic of the religious discourse in the sphere of network discourse practices by means of analyzing the particularities of realizing hypertext features and functions in the religious internet-discourse space.

Key words


linguo-pragmatic strategies, tactics, ways, polygenre organization, hypertext material

List of references


1. Asmus N. G. Lingvisticheskie osobennosti virtual’nogo kommunikativnogo prostranstva: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic features of the virtual communicative space: PhD thesis in Philological sciences]. Chelyabinsk, 2005. 265 p.
2. Akhnina K. V. Setevoi meditsinskii diskurs: yazykovye i kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie kharakteristiki: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Network medical discourse: linguistic and communicative-pragmatic characteristics: PhD thesis in Philological sciences]. Moscow, 2016. 211 p.
3. Akhrenova N. A. [Internet discourse as a hypertext]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2016, no. 3. Available at: www.evestnik-mgou.ru (accessed: 15.01.2019).
4. Bobyreva E. V. et al. Diskursivnoe prostranstvo sovremennogo mira [The discursive space of the modern world]. St. Louis, MO, Publishing House Science and Innovation Center Publ., 2014. 150 p.
5. Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [The text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007. 144 p.
6. Gorina E. V. [The discourse of the Internet in terms of its impact on the user]. In: Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics], 2015, no. 2 (52), pp. 150–156.
7. Gul’shina A. E. Lingvostilisticheskie osobennosti teksta veb-saita: problema smyslovogo vospriyatiya: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Formal features of the text web site: the problem of semantic perception: abstract of PhD thesis in Philological sciences]. Moscow, 2006. 21 p.
8. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p.
9. Kozhemyakin E. A. [Religious Internet discourse: the research methodology]. In: Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo [Bulletin of Belgorod State University. The Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law], 2010, iss. 5, no. 2 (97). Available at: http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/bitstream/123456789/11995/1/Kozhemyakin_Religioznyy.pdf (accessed: 29.12.2018).
10. Kompantseva L. F. Internet-lingvistika: kognitivno-pragmaticheskii i lingvokul’turologicheskii podkhody [Internet linguistics: cognitive-pragmatic and linguocultural approaches]. Lugansk, Knowledge Publ., 2008. 528 p.
11. Kochetkova M. O. Zhanrovaya dinamika diskursa blogosfery: sotsiolingvisticheskii aspect: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [The genre dynamics of discourse in the blogosphere: sociolinguistic aspect: abstract of PhD thesis in Philological sciences]. Tomsk, 2016. 23 p.
12. Lutovinova O. V. Lingvokul’turologicheskie kharakteristiki virtual’nogo diskursa [Lingvocultural characteristics of virtual discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2009. 477 p.
13. Ticher C. et al. Methods of analyzing text and discourse (Russ. ed.: Metody analiza teksta i diskursa. Kharkov, Humanitarian Center Publ., 2009. 356 p.).
14. Rudyakov A. N. [Linguistic instrumentology: functional description text]. In: Russkaya filologiya: nauchno-metodicheskii zhurnal [Russian philology: scientific and methodical journal], 2012, no. 3 (47), pp. 7–11.
15. Seleznеva L. V. [Interactional nature of discourse]. In: Khvoshchev V. E., Malyshev M. A., eds. Mnogolikii diskurs [Diverse discourse]. Chelyabinsk, Publishing House of the South Ural State University Publ., Clone Publ., 2012, pp. 115–122.
16. Sinel’nikova L. N. [The specifics of the sender-addressee relations in mass media discourse]. In: Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Filologiya. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii [Memoirs of Vernadsky Tauride National University. Series: Philology. Social communications], 2008, vol. 21 (60), no. 1. Available at: http://sn-philol.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ sinelnikova.pdf (accessed: 26.12.2018).
17. Temnova E. V. [Modern approaches to the study of discourse]. In: Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I., eds. Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya. Vyp. 26 [Language, consciousness, communication. Iss. 26]. Мoscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2004, pp. 24–33.
18. Formanovskaya N. I. Rechevoe obshchenie: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii podkhod [Speech communication: communicative and pragmatic approach]. Moscow, Russian language Publ., 2002. 216 p.
19. Shashkov I. A. [The members of a religious internet discourse]. In: Aktual’nye voprosy filologicheskoi nauki XXI veka. Ch. 1 [Actual issues of Philology of the XXI century. P. 1]. Ekaterinburg, UPI Training Center Publ., 2018, pp. 19–25.
20. Shevchenko I. S. [Discourse as cognitive and communicative phenomenon: units and categories]. In: Lingvisticheskie issledovaniya. Vyp. 5 [Linguistic studies. Iss. 5]. Yerevan, Limush Publ., 2015, pp. 146–158.
21. Angermuller J., Maingueneau D., Wodak R. The Discourse Studies Reader: Main currents in the theory and analysis. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. 428 p.
22. Crystall D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997. 499 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons