The article presents the study aimed at analysis of the attitude of children who live without parental care to the life situation of guardianship. The study was conducted using a structured interview, which included such methods as “Attitude to a significant life situation” and “Family APGAR”. The study involved 150 children of school age, among them 48 children from kinship care families (under the care of grandmothers). The results of the study showed that the attitude to the life situation of children under kinship and non-kinship care differs significantly. This attitude is mediated by the degree of the role conflict with the guardian. The actual life situation is least favourably assessed by children under the care of grandmothers, especially if the family maintains contact with the biological parents of the child. The results indicate the importance of considering the specifics of the child’s life situation for effective support to guardian families.

kinship care families, non-kinship care families, children of school age, life situation, situational approach

1. Abul’khanova-Slavskaya K. A. Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1991. 299 p.
2. Bezgodova S. A., Miklyaeva A. V., Yurkova E. V. [Role identity of guardians in the context of their satisfaction with the functional characteristics of a family relationship]. In: Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya [The azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology], 2018, vol. 7, no. 3 (24), pp. 357–360.
3. Bogomyagkova O. N. [The specifics of parental attitudes in families of different social categories]. In: Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya № 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Perm State Humanitarian-Pedagogical University. Series no. 1. Psychological and pedagogical sciences], 2015, no. 1, pp. 105–113.
4. Vagapova A. R., Markelova A. Yu. [The characteristics of the parent position in families of different types]. In: Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya [Proceedings of Saratov University. New series. Acmeology of education. Developmental psychology], 2018. vol. 7, no. 2 (26), pp. 170–175.
5. Volkova E. N., Grishina A. V. [The structure of subjectivity younger adolescents with different levels of computer game addiction]. In: Psikhologicheskii zhurna [Psychological journal], 2015, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 20–31.
6. Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka [Psychology understanding of the human world]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of RAS Publ., 2016. 488 p.
7. Kalacheva I. V. [The characteristics of the parent-child relationship in foster care]. In: Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya [Science vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology], 2012, no. 1 (8), pp. 166–168.
8. Korzhova E. Yu., Volkova E. N., Vekilova S. A., Tereshkina I. B. [Psychology of foster families in line with the situational approach]. In: Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Proceedings of Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia], 2018, no. 187, pp. 134–145.
9. Korzhova E. Yu., Volkova E. N., Rudykhina O. V., Tumanova E. N. [The psychology of the person as the subject of life and way of life of the individual: the main results of the research]. In: Izvestia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Proceedings of Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia], 2018, no. 187, pp. 40–50.
10. Korzhova E. Yu., Berdnikova A. V. [The technique “Attitude to important life situations”]. In: Korjova E. Yu., ed. Praktikum po psikhologii zhiznennykh situatsii [Workshop on the psychology of situations]. St. Petersburg, Stiks Publ., 2016, pp. 59–73.
11. Leont’ev D. A. [What gives psychology a concept of the subject: subjectivity as a dimension of personality]. In: Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science], 2010, no. 3 (25), pp. 135–153.
12. Morozova I. S., Belogai K. N., Ott T. O. [Features of parent-child relationships in adoptive families]. In: Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Kemerovo State University], 2014, no. 3–3 (59), pp. 146–151.
13. Myasishchev V. N. Psikhologiya otnoshenii [Psychology of relationships]. Moscow, Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publ., 2005. 158 p.
14. Oleinik V. V. [Family diagnosis in the ward families]. In: Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Proceedings of Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia], 2007, vol. 17, no. 43–2, pp. 194–197.
15. Osipova A. A. [Psychological problems of foster family]. In: Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Proceedings of Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia], 2013, no. 161, pp. 290–298.
16. Oslon V. N. Zhizneustroistvo detei-sirot: professional’naya zameshchayushchaya sem’ya [Living arrangements of children-orphans: a professional foster family]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 2014. 366 p.
17. Petrovsky V. A. [“Subjectivity” in the space of culture and reality]. In: Mir psikhologii [World of psychology], 2015, no. 3 (83), pp. 14–38.
18. Rubinstein S. L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the world]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997. 189 p.
19. Selezneva M. V. [The analysis of the notions “subject” and “subjectivity”: problems and solutions]. In: Rossiiskii nauchnyi zhurnal [Russian scientific journal], 2016, no. 1 (50), pp. 82–93.
20. Tuzova O. N. [Guardianship as a socio-psychological phenomenon]. In: Sciences of Europe, 2017, no. 14–2 (14), pp. 97–100.
21. Berrick J. D., Barth R. P., Needell B. A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation. In: Children and Youth Services Review, 1994, vol. 16, p. 33–63.
22. Courtney M. E. Reentry to foster care of children returned to their families. In: Children and Youth Services Review, 1995, vol. 69, pp. 226–232.
23. Downie J.,  Hay D.,  Horner B.,  Wichmann H., Hislop A. Children Living with Their Grandparents: Resilience and Well Being. In: International Journal of Social Welfare, 2010, vol. 19 (1), pp. 8–22.
24. Dunne E. G., Kettler L. J. Grandparents raising grandchildren in Australia: exploring psychological health and grandparents’ experience of providing kinship care. In: International Journal of Social Welfare, 2008, vol. 17, pp. 333–345.
25. Farmer E., Selwyn J., Meakings S. “Other children say you’re not normal because you don’t live with your parents”. Children’s views of living with informal kinship carers: social networks, stigma and attachment to carers. In: Child and Family Social Work, 2013, vol. 18, pp. 25–34.
26. Gaudin J. M., Sutphen R. Foster care versus extended family care for children of incarcerated mothers. In: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 1993, vol. 19 (3/4), pp. 129–144.
27. Harris M. S., Skyles A. Kinship care for African American children: Disproportionate and disadvantageous. In: Journal of Family Issues, 2008, vol. 29 (8), pp. 1013–1030.
28. Hedin L. A sense of belonging in a changeable everyday life – a follow-up study of young people in kinship, network, and traditional foster families. In: Child and Family Social Work, 2014, vol. 19, pp. 165–173.
29. Hegar R. L. The cultural roots of kinship care. In: Hegar R. L., Scannapieco M., eds. Kinship foster care: Policy, practice, and research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 17–27.
30. Messing J.  From the child’s perspective: a qualitative analysis of kinship care placements. In: Children and Youth Services Review, 2006, vol. 28 (12), pp. 1415–1434.
31. Nixon P. Relatively speaking: Developments in research and practice in kinship care. Dartington, Research in Practice, 2007. 118 р.
32. O’Brien V. The benefits and challenges of kinship care. In: Child Care in Practice, 2012, vol. 18 (2), pp. 127–146.
33. Smilkstein G. The family APGAR: A proposal for a family functioning test and its use by physicians. In: Journal of Family Practice, 1978, vol. 6, pp. 1231–1239.
34. Smith J., Boone A. Future outlook in African American kinship care families. In: Journal of Health & Social Policy, 2007, vol. 22 (3–4), pp. 9–30.
35. Winokur M. A., Holtan A., Batchelder K. E. Systematic review of kinship care effects on safety, permanency, and well-being outcomes. In: Research on Social Work Practice, 2018, vol. 28 (1), pp. 19–32.
36. Ziminski J. Systemic practice with kinship care families. In: Journal of Social Work Practice, 2007, vol. 21 (2), pp. 239–250.