The article is devoted to the analysis of contradictions of modern humanitarian discourse conceptualizing the universal status of political rights and freedoms, as well as the associated universal human identity in the international political dimension. Applying the poststructuralist approach to the analysis of political practices, the author demonstrates that modern humanism, claiming the universalist status, nevertheless, contributes to the construction of communities of “friends” and “enemies”. It is this contradiction that allows the use of humanitarian discourse in securitization practices, as well as the legitimization of violence and emergency measures.

humanitarian discourse, human rights, identity, securitization, state of emergency.

1. Agamben G. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast’ i golaya zhizn’ [The Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life]. Moscow, Europe Publ., 2011. 256 p.
2. Agamben G. Homo sacer. Chrezvychainoe polozhenie [The Homo sacer. A state of emergency]. Moscow, Europe Publ., 2011. 148 p.
3. Arendt H. The origins of totalitarianism (Russ. ed.: Borisova I. V., Kimeleva Yu. A., Kovaleva A. D., Mishkenene Yu. B., Sedova L. A., transls. Istoki totalitarizma. Moscow, TsentrKom Publ., 1996. 672 p.).
4. Arendt H. Otvetstvennost’ i suzhdenie [Responsibility and judgment]. Moscow, Publishing House of Gaidar Institute Publ., 2013. 352 p.
5. Bakhtin M. M. [Under the mask of V. N. Voloshinova]. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka [Marxism and the philosophy of language]. Moscow, Labyrinth, 1993. 193 p.
6. Bakhtin M. M. [Author and hero in aesthetic activity]. In: Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Art Publ., 1986, pp. 9–191.
7. Volkodav M. A. Primenenie politicheskogo diskurs-analiza v reshenii ideologicheskikh zadach (na primere mediatizatsii politicheskikh tekstov): dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Applying political discourse analysis in solving ideological problems (on the example of mediatization of political texts): PhD thesis in Philological sciences]. Krasnodar, 2007. 191 p.
8. Ћiћek S. Protiv prav cheloveka [Against human rights], 2010. Available at: https://fmbooks.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/zizek-text.pdf (accessed: 15.05.2019).
9. Kapustin B. G. Grazhdanstvo i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo [Citizenship and civil society]. Moscow, Publishing house of Higher school of Economics, 2011. 224 p.
10. Lefor K. Politicheskie ocherki (XIX–XX vekov) [Political essays (XIX–XX centuries)]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2000. 368 p.
11. Makarychev A. S. [Security and the return of the political: critical debates in Europe]. In: Indeks bezopasnosti [Safety index], 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 25–40.
12. Makarychev A. S. [The sovereignty, power and political subjectivity: two lines of critical theory]. In: Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political expertise: POLITEX], 2010, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 22–52.
13. Morozov V. E. [Security as a form of political: on securitization and politicization]. In: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Policy. Political studies], 2011, no. 3, pp. 24–35.
14. Tikhonov I. M. [A topical issue of international law: the concept of “Responsibility to Protect”]. In: Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: ot teorii k praktike [Priority research areas: from theory to practice], 2013, no. 7, pp. 203–210.
15. Fedorov A. V. Superterrorizm: novyi vyzov novogo veka [Super-terrorism: a new challenge for a new century]. Moscow, Prava cheloveka Publ., 2002. 392 p.
16. Habermas J. [The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights]. In: Habermas J. Esse k konstitutsii Evropy [The Essay to the Constitution of Europe]. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 2013, pp. 13–40.
17. Shmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya [Political theology]. Moscow, KANON-Press Publ., 2000. 336 p.
18. Ayoob M. Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty. In: International Journal of Human Rights, 2002, no. 6 (1), pp. 81–102.
19. Balibar E. Is a Philosophy of Human Civic Possible? New Reflection on Equaliberty. In: South Atlantic Quarterly, 2014, no. 103, pp. 312–321.
20. Bricmont J. Humanitarian Imperialism. New York, Monthly Review, 2006. 176 р.
21. Butler J. Precarious Life: the Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York, Verso, 2004. 170 р.
22. Campbell D. Why fight: humanitarianism, principles, and post-structuralism. In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1998, no. 27 (3), pp. 497–521.
23. Closs Stephens A., Vaughan-Williams N. Introduction: London, time, terror. In: Closs Stephens A., Vaughan-Williams N., eds. Terrorism and the Politics of Response. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009, pp. 1–17.
24. Dillon M. Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought. London, New York, Routledge, 1996. 254 p.
25. Edkins J. Humanitarianism, Humanity, Human. In: Journal of Human Rights, 2003, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 253–258.
26. Edkins J. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 284 p.
27. Macrae J. The death of humanitarianism? An anatomy of the attack. In: Disasters, 1998, no. 22 (4), pp. 309–317.
28. McAteer C. Finding the Human in Humanitarianism. Available at: http://www.christophermcateer.com/2013/04/08/finding-the-human-in-humanitarianism (accessed: 10.05.2019).
29. Watson S. The «human» as referent object? Humanitarianism as securitization. In: Security Dialogue, 2011, no. 42 (1), pp. 3–20.
30. Williams M. C. Worlds, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. In: International Studies Quarterly, 2003, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 511–531.