Journal sections
Archive and statistics
Log in

Печатный вестник PRINTED
Издательство МГОУ Publishing house the

Our address: 105005, Moscow, Radio street,10a, office 98.

+7 (495) 780-09-42 add. 1740,
+7 (495) 723-56-31


Work schedule: Monday to Thursday from 10-00 to 17-30,

Friday from 10:00 to 16-00,

lunch break from 13:00 to 14-00.



BK Facebook Telegram Twitter Instagram

Bulletin of the MRSU / Section "Philological sciences" / 2019 № 4.


Y.A. Evgrafova (Zakirova), M.G. Novikova

VERBAL AND AUDIAL COMPONENTS OF THE SCREEN “SPEECH”. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University (electronic journal), 2019, no. 4.


UDC Index: 81’37

Date of publication: 25.10.2019

The full text of the article

Downloads count Downloads count: 19


The aim of this article is the study of correlation of verbal and non-verbal (audial) components of the screen speech in polycode-multimodal texts. The eliminating, description and analysis of its features in a concrete text are also studied. The main bulk of the study is held on the fiction and non-fiction film texts at the level of several shots. The study progress is illustrated through the analysis of drama “Loveless” and film “Earth: One Amazing Day”. The research showed that verbal and non-verbal components enter structural-semiotic relations (of interdependence and determination), which widens the semantics of the text, the simulated reality gaining volume. In the conclusion of the article the perspectives of further studies of syncretic texts in relation to the implementation of verbal and non-verbal components are stated.

Key words

syncretic text, polycode-multimodal text, the screen speech, audial components, verbal components, film text

List of references

1. Bodrova A. A. [Nonverbal elements of interpretation context construction in films]. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod], 2009, no. 1, pp. 208–210.
2. Gavrilova T. I., Dragun E. I. [Cinema as a semiotic message]. In: Bozhenkova N. A., scientific ed. Novyi vzglyad na problemy sovremennogo yazykoznaniya: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii shkol’nikov, studentov i aspirantov [A new look at the problems of modern linguistics: materials of the IV International scientific conference of schoolchildren, students and postgraduate students]. Kursk, the Southwest State University Publ., 2013. pp. 39–43.
3. Denikin A. A. [The model for diegetic analysis of sounds in screen media]. In: Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal «Mediamuzyka» [Electronic scientific journal Mediamusic], 2013, no. 2. Available at: http://mediamusic- (accessed: 10.10.2019).
4. Dukhovnaya T. V. [Structural components of film discourse]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2015, no. 1-1 (43), pp. 64–66.
5. Evgrafova Yu. A. [“Screen “language” and screen “speech” in the static scope of the heterogeneous texts: discrete units of the movement continuum]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyi zhurnal) [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal)], 2019, no. 2. Available at: (accessed: 13.10.2019).
6. Karpukhina V. N., Kornov K. A. [Multi-code transmission of intertextuality forms]. In: Yazyki i literatura v polikul’turnom prostranstve [Languages and Literature in a Multicultural Space], 2016, no. 2, pp. 56–60.
7. Kolodina E. A. [The status of film dialogue among the related concepts: film dialogue, film text, film discourse]. In: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod], 2013, no. 2-1, pp. 327–333.
8. Koryachkina A. V. [Feature film as discourse]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2015, no. 3-3 (45), pp. 91–97.
9. Kubrak T. A. [Psychological characteristics of cinema perception in modern cinema discourse]. In: Zhuravlev A. L., Sergienko E. A., eds. Chelovek, sub”ekt, lichnost’ v sovremennoi psikhologii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 80-letiyu A. V. Brushlinskogo. Tom 3 [Man, subject, personality in modern psychology: materials of the International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of A. V. Brushlinsky. Volume 3]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Science Publ., 2013, pp. 315–317.
10. Lepikhova I. V. [Hermeneutics of movie reality]. In: Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being], 2014, no. 5, pp. 64–85.
11. McLuhan H. M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (Russ. ed.: Nikolaeva V., transl. Ponimanie Media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. Moscow, Zhukovskiy, «KANON-press-TS», «Kuchkovo pole» Publ., 2003. 464 p.
12. Maksimenko O. I. [Polycode vs. creolized text: terminology problems]. In: Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika [RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics], 2012, no. 2, pp. 93–102.
13. Maslov Yu. V. [Philological, Social, Cultural and Methodological Aspects of the English Precedent Cinema Texts]. In: Pastukhov A. G., chief ed. Zhanry i tipy teksta v nauchnom i mediinom diskurse: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vip. 10 [Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse: a collection of scientific papers. Iss. 10]. Oryol, Oryol State Institute of Culture Publ., 2012, pp. 177–187.
14. Nelyubina Yu. A. [Film discourse as a kind of media discourse]. In: Slovo, vyskazyvanie, tekst v kognitivnom, pragmaticheskom i kul’turologicheskom aspektakh: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Word, utterance, text in cognitive, pragmatic and cultural aspects: proceedings of the VIII International Scientific Conference]. Chelyabinsk, Entsiklopediya Publ., 2016, pp., 312–315.
15. Ognev K. K. [The screen adaptation of the Strugatski brothers and development of Russian cinema]. In: Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences], 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–46.
16. Poznin V. F. [Cinema next of documentary film as a product of critical reflection of reality]. In: Medialingvistika [Media Linguistics], 2016, no. 2 (12), pp. 26–36.
17. Slyshkin G. G., Efremova M. A. Kinotekst (opyt lingvokul’turologicheskogo analiza) [Film text (the Experience of linguistic and cultural analysis)]. Moscow, Vodolei Publishers Publ., 2004. 153 p.
18. Turysheva O. N. [“Legend of the Great inquisitor” as a part of an inter-textual code Lars von Trier’’s film text “Dogvill”]. In: Ural’skii filologicheskii Vestnik. Seriya: Russkaya klassika: dinamika khudozhestvennykh system [Ural Journal of Philology. Russian Classic: the Dynamics of Artistic Systems], 2015, no. 3, pp. 186–194.
19. Shaev Yu. M. [Some peculiarities of spatiotemporal structures in the virtual narrative]. In: Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University], 2013, no. 4, pp. 217–219.
20. Shapovalova V. E. [Cinematographic text in the modern cultural intertext]. In: Studia Linguistica, 2016, no. XXV, pp. 197–203.
21. McLuhan M. Understanding Media. The extensions of man. London: New York: Ginko Press, 2003. 605 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons